Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Acts of Disgrace and Scholars' Avenue

Review: Last issue of The Scholar's Avenue

Instructions before reading the issue:
=>If you're a Nehruite, this issue isn't meant for you...
(You already have something to celebrate, we are focussing on what we have.)
Anyways, the publication believes that PAN Loop is not a part of the institute system.
=>You must have enough imagination to believe the way we present the story.

Lessons for wannabe editors:
=>Treat a paper as a personal property. Use it to your personal benefit as much as you can, without thinking for even a moment what effect it will have on the community.
=>Rumours and status messages are the best source of information.
=>When you are biased, be so biased that none have any doubts in their minds.
=>Guest columns are Weapons of Mass Destruction! You wont be held responsible also!


Now, i'd like to get a bit serious, though i know that this paper is not at all serious. I dont know how much truth it contains, but i heard that the publishers themselves go to gymkhana authorities explaining what they have written.. and they get the reply that the authorities are yet to receive a complain! I also wished to convey how 'heard' informations should go to public.

The paper has really reliable sources- the ones who use it for full page interviews and taking the credits for anything that happens here. These sources must have constant updates of the DC meeting. The DC committee was never to hand over hell to Nehru Hall, as reported. If you could hear that focus shifted from individuals to hall, hey man! you shouldn't have shut your receivers to note that nothing fatal was supposed to come out. To all the poltubaaz junta, i 'd just like to say one thing- by working for all the foul plays, you just end up worsening the already pathetic culture at this place. I dont know what pride these people find in troubling others and then taking the credits for this. This just reminds me of the ideology behind the Ladens!

Between Heaven and Hell

Coming back to 'Nehru Hall Near Hell', i bet some of the halls had much more embarassing days than Nehru these days. And that these days were embarassing for Nehru residents, we came to know through this article only. Believe me, we were having an absolute party-time with our alumni down to hall wings. There, too, you created 'STORIES of emotionally charged people shaking their heads (as also other body parts).....'. What a story! What a selection of words! What respect for alumni! It really becomes difficult for people to differentiate where fiction takes charge amidst facts! Anyways, no fault of yours! That just spices up the matter. Leave all the matters aside, who gives you the rights to report on what's going inside a hall?

Acts of Disgrace

The publication believes that its their moral duty to report the disgrace Nehru has brought to the campus and the campus culture by their act when they 're publishing that the hall won all three GCs. Good to be a moral watchdog! Boss, you turn a blind eye to much more disgraceful and coward acts. Again, no fault of yours! But, i 'd like to point out some of them.

JAM and Antakshari got cancelled this year. Everyone knows why. The opponents believed the GC chapter will be closed with the Western Groups event. All the foul plays that ran in the background are doing greater damage to this place than the 'DEGRADING' apology that Nehru guys put up in front of RP folks.


Further, the SOP Boxes got cancelled. Few people know why. One of the parties in the election was afraid that weaknesses of their candidate will be exposed. All the lies, foul plays came to their rescue and it was a well-managed affair. Trust my words, this has done an irrepairable damage to the electoral system at kgp. I 've few more cases of people bringing disgrace to the campus life with their rampant misuse of power, but, each one comes with controversies of its own.

Columns which required editing

Another big story- this hall manages to manipulate the results in Western Groups without a g sec and the secy. The guest column declares that the hall which didn't deserve to be in the top three, finished with a gold. I can understand that judging is quite atrocious in this place but why people cry only when they 're not on the winning side. And this publication deserves all the credits for beautifully using the guest articles at the right moment. The paper doesnt listen to it when a team is asked to put up the performance at national level, when the performance is exceptional. They dont listen to it when the scoresheets in dramatics leave a distant second. It only finds unexpected golds! It only finds people who were disqualified. It prefers making personal comments in successive issues on the person concerned. Not your fault, again!

I know that you have matured seeing the culture of bias around you and it needs character to defy that and work for a constructive environment. We are in a place everyone uses power to serve personal motives and cries foul when not in power. It really needs sound character to use it for the benefit of the concerned community and not misuse it for expressing personal opinions. All that i can i say is- all the best, kgp!


The fierce criticism is meant for realizations and not hurting anyone's sentiments. To all those who couldn't avoid getting hurt, i'm sorry with the bundle of hurt sentiments on my side. I could have done with a plain criticism. But, in this place, it doesnt make any impact.

With last few days of stay left in kgp, i bear more affiliation to the institute than the hall. I only wish to see a sense of responsibilty in all future publications, towards creating a better campus and campus environment.

36 comments:

  1. Finally someone has shown the courage to take the bull by its Finally someone has shown the courage to take the bull by its horns......"their" insidious activities have made a medium as powerful as SA nothing but a tool with which "their masters" can get back at their "enemies". There is enough rivarly in this academic institution already, I guess we can all do without something which does nothing but flare up these rivalries...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well sm issue tht was...i'm sorry to say that "schols ave" is no longer "scholarly" in its outlook but rather the mouthpiece of a hall pretty similar to our cricket control board (all the money in the world can't change it!!!!) and another in its vicinity whose honour has been "imposed" upon...also the guest column contains views of a person who rather did nothin in his post of responsibility n nw talks abt changing the system coz another hall won unexpected golds :P ...at the end of it all we nehruites deeply regret having won all three GCs two of them rather convincingly leaving behind "impressive yet distant" second places and creating unprecedented history!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The post as well as the 'allowed' comments are heavily biased, and not Scholars' Avenue...

    ReplyDelete
  4. SA has made a lot of contribution to the campus but it seems the editors keep their halls pesrpective ahead of plain truth in matters of inter hall events .SA did an xceptional job during placements but i gues it didnt do nethin more either . personal comments of ex gsec who failed to get a podium finish in an event strts cribbin abt it in SA, the gsec undoubtedly is frm the same hall as tht of the editor.... wt else can u xpect.

    ReplyDelete
  5. frankly speaking, the words in Schols Ave never really hit me that hard....it appeared to me as some incessant complaining on the part of the losers which Nehru has got used to by now...perhaps, to us, these things don't matter now....but the grave irresponsibility that Schols Ave has shown should be criticized severely and that's what u have done. kudos!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr Codesmith!
    You 're also allowed....... do you mean to say that you 're biased yourself....
    And plz note that everyone is allowed here....

    ReplyDelete
  7. SA doesnot deserve the attention we are giving them here! Who takes them seriously. I couldnot help but notice that 60% ppl from my wing did not even pick it up from their door step! How to make a Tinku is the title of one of the articles! How ridiculous!

    ReplyDelete
  8. well well well ... being divisive is nothing new in the already divided heartland ... sorry hallland of this place

    but lets wait a minute and analyse the whole thing from the point of a neutral ... apart form the article by the guest ... all else is pretty much in place as far as the fcats are concerned

    SA has equally lauded the marvelous feat achieved by the nehruites alongside an expose into the mentality that semms to stricke people when they achieve sumthing in the shambles called KGP. These are the times when one feels ashamed to be a part of the culture

    It wud be much better and honest if everyone accepted their mistakes. Results getting fixed and rigged is nothing new ... and any hall that cribs about it now wud do the same if they get the desired secy next year. and it wasnt just the "other halls" that wanted JAM and antakshari scrapped /postponed. Having been present on spot i can vouch for that.

    now coming to a bit of respect. Even though i might be ashamed at being KGPian when the petty hall rivalry overatkes all other sentiments ... but in my two years of stay here i have also witnessed events that have made me proud of the felings and respect that people of KGP are capable of showing. I will give just two examples from this past year:

    1. Nehru Choreo : There wasnt a single person inside Netaji that dint stand up and applaud the performance. people even went outside the audi to congratulate ur participants and cheering Nehru tempo shout ... that in itself is a feat in KGP

    2. Instance no 2: an nehruite standing on patel gate and saying "yo patel for rangoli".


    so in our parts ... lets show a bit of sanity than cribbing about everything ... NH shud accept that they went too far ... SA on its part shud accept that certain words were beyond what was reuired or demanded by the situation. also if the pandorras' box was not opened the last why was it done this time .... and for the NH poeple ... arent you forgetting that you have your representation in SA as well???

    so wat say

    ReplyDelete
  9. @ Mr Mango,
    The whole incident was an accident and not a plan. The hall concerned put up its apology immediately after realizing the mistake. The whole issue was settled before the SA issue came. They have just spoiled the whole environment with one act.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You do blog well, Vivek Kumar. Keep the tempo going. :-)

    Coming to this post of yours: allow me to dissect it, piece by piece. No, this isnt for your sake. This is for all the innocent folks who might get swayed by your words. I hope you will be generous enough to allow this comment to remain on your blog. :-)

    Lets begin.

    "Anyways, the publication believes that PAN Loop is not a part of the institute system."

    The trouble with you, Vivek Kumar, is that you read only half the stuff thats written and try extrapolating the other half. Or maybe its worse than half and half. Anyways, for the sake of the reader, Scholars' Avenue had conducted a poll amongst first years last year in which we'd asked people which hall they wanted to go to. We printed the results along with some of the interesting comments and opinions that the some first years had. One of these comments was "I dont consider PAN loop to be a part of the Kgp system". Mind you, the article very explictly mentioned that this was a first years' comment.

    Vivek Kumar, as honorable as he is, somehow managed to miss the plot. To this day, he rants about Scholars' Avenue believing that PAN loop isnt a part of the Kgp system. This, despite the fact that Schols Ave was founded by a Patelian. Ah well, lets allow him these simple pleasures of life, shall we?

    Moving on...

    "Another big story- this hall manages to manipulate the results in Western Groups without a g sec and the secy."

    MANIPULATE? Manipulate?!! For the sake of heaven or hell, do read articles carefully before you open your big mouth to rant about them. The guest author merely expresses his discontent with the judging levels in so-cult events in this institute. Nowhere does he say that the results in this Western Groups were manipulated. The trouble with you, an honorable editor that you are, is that you dont even read articles well enough. The day you start doing that, maybe you'll understand the author's intentions better. But then again, maybe you dont want to. Coz wouldnt that just take all the sensationalism away from your posts?

    "The paper doesnt listen to it when a team is asked to put up the performance at national level when the performance is exceptional." Oh dont we? Let me reproduce a line from our article on this performance: "... given the superhuman effort put in by the Nehru team which culminated in them striking gold in all five events". Or maybe we werent paying heed to the three GC victories when we lauded them as the "Event of the year # 1". I cant say it often enough: honorable editor that you are, you'd be well advised to read articles fully before commenting on them.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sunny,
    Thanks for appreciating the blog...and dont ever doubt my generosity! I've also read the personal comments that you have left.

    Here begins the basic problem with the publication you 're associated with. None are innocent folks here. Everyone is sensible enough to understand things and interpret.

    I very well remember that the survey conducted by you had some 'INTERESTING' results also- around 240 people wished to go to RK hall and there were none who didnt. When it came to Azad or Patel, i remember there was a sizeable crowd which, according to the survey didnt wish to go the hall. The no of people who wished to go to any of these halls dropped to two-digit figures. Being in a hall which is not the preferred destination of first years, according to your survey, i can still believe that your survey was not manufactured.
    But, there are certain guidelines that must be followed while choosing such surveys.
    Moreover, SA finds comments like-"I dont consider PAN loop to be a part of the Kgp system" interesting!
    Being involved in few publications in kgp, i know the kind of interesting comments that come with the surveys. My friend! there are certain responsibilities of a publication. There are certain things that arent considered for print as it might hurt sentiments as well as degrading the community environment. The biggest problem with you people is that you never realized that.
    If you still believe in publishing "interesting" comments, i assure you of supplying tens of them.

    Next, i'm sorry i wont come down to who founded it and how was SA founded and the hall commitments of SA.

    Sunny yaar! tumse ye expected nahi tha...
    You have written-"For the sake of heaven or hell, do read articles carefully before you open your big mouth to rant about them. "
    Khud nahi karte ho, doosare ko bolte ho yaar.
    Pehli line padhi aapne-
    "Another big story- this hall manages to manipulate the results in Western Groups without a g sec and the secy."
    doosari bhi padh lete-
    The guest column declares that the hall which didn't deserve to be in the top three, finished with a gold.

    Just tell me, how can someone manage a gold when it doesnt deserve to be in top three? Must be some favours, some manipulations. Right?

    And for the two-three lines of appreciation you had published in your paper for Nehru's PLATINUM gc, i thank you on the behalf of Nehru Hall. I'd request you one thing, please go through your post-gc edition of last year and see the difference.

    One more advice, your publication should prepare it well before coming with the reply. Take your time,

    ReplyDelete
  12. sahi hai miya..100 chuhe khaake billi haj ko chali... jitni gandagi Nehru GC's jeetne ke liye machaya hai uspar to aapne ek shabd bhi nahi likha or chale hai kisi or pe keechad uchalne !!!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Hi Vivek,

    This is not about Nehru Hall or Scholars Avenue.. This would be about you - as a person.

    Believe me - I held you in great respect until a few days back. What you've written here is a very skewed piece. Of all ppl, I thought you, as an editor of a newspaper, would get the drift, but all I see here is hypocrisy. I won't like to go hammer and tongs over every point (coz honestly I don't think I even should've commented on the blog), but then the number of people that are getting swayed by the piece is shocking.

    I used to feel surprised when my batchmates and juniors alike (non-ScholsAve members, for the record) used to decry your attitude, and even argued against them to make them understand your point of view. After the failure of Manzar in terms of participation (which was held in the first place because SF supposedly does not organize the lit events properly and does not offer enough financial incentives) and the narrow point-of-view that you've expressed in this blog, I'm sorry to say - I've lost all respect for you.
    I apologize for saying this in public, but when things go this far, I don't think its not prudent to make my feelings known.

    Just a thought - before raising fingers, please try to put yourself in the other person's shoes and think about it from his perspective.

    For all Nehruites - Guys, very honestly, the very fact that Nehru's Platinum GC has been rated as the top story on campus this year over something as critical and career-affecting as '27% Reservations' and 'Foreign Placements' speaks volumes about how much importance has been given to the achievement in the newspaper. All this, apart from a comprehensive round-up on how Nehru won the 3 GCs. Its sad to see that even after all this, Vivek had to write a demeaning piece on the so-called political aspirations of ScholsAve.

    But then, on a white canvas, its easy to make out a black spot. I would simply try to think like a neutral person - was it something very benevolent that happened in RP? Coming to think of it from a holistic point of view, won't you like to think that its important to make sure it doesn't happen again? A simple question of soul-searching, guys. Nobody at ScholsAve would have anything personal against a hall - not last of all because some of the members from our own team are Nehruites. I know that many of my fellow team members would not be too happy with me for writing this comment from a defensive point of views, but its just the way I thought it should be.

    Vivek miyaan - Good luck for your future endeavours. It was a pleasure knowing you.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Oh, and btw, I'd like to quote something from the SF-ridiculing article from Aawaaz's Jan issue (which also happened to be the only issue this sem; unfortunately - we couldn't get more of the groundbreaking realities this year from the Aawaaz team):

    "Hawa ke rukh ke viprit hamaari iss chaal se jo log aahat hue hain unse yeh gujaarish hai ki isse dil par na lein aur iss par thande dimaag se sochein. Yeh aalochna pragati ke liye hai, hangaame ke liye nahi"

    Even though the article was not exactly "Nehru ke viprit" in the truest sense, the idea behind the piece was very similar.

    Cheers,
    Chintan

    ReplyDelete
  15. Its really amazing to see that how ppl exploit an issue to settle their scores. Its my request to both the warring sides to stop this nonsense. We all know what is the reality and u very fine ppl are not trying to understand that ur arguements and counter-arguements are only going to aggravate the problem. I know that both the sides have done a commendable job by publishing quality news itmes but for heaven's sake just tell me onething why the hell are u spoiling the all good deeds that you have done. The whole series of comments show that a few people are trying to express their personal grudges in form of words. I know each one of you are respectable superfinal years so its your moral responsibilty to set examples of healthy long lasting relationships that you gained in these 5 years rather than spoiling each others image in public...its my sincere request .

    ReplyDelete
  16. Ok,
    But to say the truth, everyone knows that Nehru was more praised in SA than pointed out, both for real facts. And there is nothing which seems to be exaggerated or badly presented to me.

    Btw, thanks a lot for appreciating my poem.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hi Chintan,

    Believe me, i still respect you. I believe the issues i had raised were against SA and not you. The reactions
    seemed to miss the whole point.
    Please note that this is my personal blog. I'm not writing here in the capacity of editor, some publication. I believe there is a huge difference in the two and that must always be maintained.

    I 'd request all the people commenting on the blog to stick to the issue.

    I 'd reiterate the issue is that Publications must realize a sense of responsibility when they 're catering to a large community.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Sahi hai....
    SA ne ab performances ko judge karne ka bhi beeda utha liya lagta hai.

    Khair dukh ke saath kehna pad raha hai jitna level SA ki page quality ka gira hai...usase kahin jyada SA ki editorial team ka gira lagta hai [:(]

    ReplyDelete
  19. For all those who think " putting Nehru hall GC performance as no.1 event of the year speaks volumes about how much importance has been given to the achievement in the newspaper " should realize that the kind of fight-back Nehru Hall put up all through the year this time, they don't need a newspaper to prove that they were the NO.1 event of the year. Everybody already knew that.

    Coming to the SA issue this year, I think the Editors really have stooped to the lowest levels to show the hall down. First, an SA issue, which, till now, had to be subscribed for to get a hard copy, or had a system of one copy a wing system, goes on to distribute the SA copy to each and every room of all the halls. Some might argue that this was the final edition of theirs in this session, but then, shudn't this have calld for a better quality of paper that was used to publish it...considering it was to be a "special" issue??

    No use going into the guest columns . Enough has already been said. And to those in the team who still think that editing the guest columns without having a moral responsibility of what effect the article would have on the community

    No point putting up a stand against an issue the SA team themselves know they cannot defend.

    ReplyDelete
  20. aisa kya? humein to aisa kuchh bhi nahi dikha. but then, apke jaisi paarkhi nazar hum tuchh praniyon ke paas kahan!! ap thahre buddhijivi (aur thode parjivi bhi) aur hum bhautik duniya mein doobe neech kutsit atmaon ke swami. apka humara mel kahan??

    pata nahi itni goodh baatein apko hi kaise dikhti hain? apke us chashme mein koi daiviya shakti vaas karti hai kya? har jagah burai aur shadyantra hi pata nahi kyon dikhta hai apko? par wo kahte hain na, baahar apni hi vaastvikta dikhti hai. to shayad...

    pata nahi, humari to aukaat hi nahi itne serious maamlon par tippani karne ki. iska to aapne ajeevan theka le kar rakha hai.

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Naween
    Bandhuvar, Mujhe meri vastavikta ka ahsaas karaane ke liye shukriya!

    waise mudde par bhi kuchh baat kar lete to thodi aur khushi hoti.

    Aur chhoti chhoti baaton pe aukaat pe kyun utar aate ho yaar.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @intel inside: I'll take that apart point by point:

    [1] So when the newspaper says that its acknowledging the achievement, you say that "Who needs a newspaper". Say if it hadn't, you would've said "You didn't even notice the achievement!" Tell me - What should a good newspaper do? [:)]

    [2] If you didn't know about it, hear it from me now - We shall be returning the money to the subscribers. Please wait before jumping to sudden conclusions.

    [3] By no means was this a "special issue". What made you think this is a special issue? We've rather been taking pains so that from now on, each one in the Institute can get the newspaper to his room. Reading the newspaper is upto you, man! Also, if you didn't notice, the issue was not just dedicated to the so-called Nehru-bashing. There was also some very groundbreaking news like Kgp going to get a brand new multi-speciality hospital soon.

    [4] "Better quality of paper"! Dude, was there nothing else for you to write apart from pointing out the inferior quality of paper? Did it make a difference in the readability of the news?

    [5] If you thought the SA editors cannot defend their issue, this is precisely what they're doing here on your beloved Vivek Kumar's blog. [:)]

    Cheers,
    Chintan

    PS: I must say - Vivek does create a lot of sensationalism. He'll be a great journalist when he joins a news channel! Kya yaar, Vivek miyaan - Exam time mein itni mehnat karwa rahein humse! Not that we mind - not one bit! [:)] Rather glad to put the point across.

    ReplyDelete
  23. hai raam!! maine mudde par hi to baat ki thii. par ap buddhijivi logon ko kahan samajh mein ayegi hum logon ki baatein [:(]!!

    kaa karein, aukaat hi nahi hai na ap jaise badey logon ke munh lagne ki [:(]...

    ReplyDelete
  24. eh bhai! 10 din bache hain kgp mein. pichhle 5 saalon ke khushi ke sin yaad kar aur khush reh. main to yehi kar raha hoon.

    Kisi series mien dekha tha. koi ek terminally ill pateint ko bol raha tha, "Please do not let your last days be consumed by anger"

    ReplyDelete
  25. @ chintan

    Point wise answer..hmmm

    Lets clarify your points one by one


    point 1: if i could remember correctly..and if i am not blind, this is what u wrote:
    "
    For all Nehruites - Guys, very honestly, the very fact that Nehru's Platinum GC has been rated as the top story on campus this year over something as critical and career-affecting as '27% Reservations' and 'Foreign Placements' speaks volumes about how much importance has been given to the achievement in the newspaper. All this, apart from a comprehensive round-up on how Nehru won the 3 GCs."

    I never said that a newspaper should NOT acknowledge an achivement,but to say that putting up this feat "ahead of something as critical and career-affecting as '27% Reservations' and 'Foreign Placements' speaks volumes about how much importance has been given to the achievement in the newspaper" ,well, I guess u are trying to say that this feat should not have been there and that SA has been "very kind" to the hall putting it as no.1.

    Coming to your point 2, I really have no idea that SA is returning the money of all the subscribers. I guess SA team members have stopped putting up notices on their own website before taking any action. Just as they had "forgotten" to update the website before the "April 17 issue" of SA(Which has till now not been updated. I know u ppl are too busy to do tht. But it comes into one of the top priorities of the list ryte? I mean...the first thing the SA team does is announce their issue on their website. Atleast thts wat they used to do till now. Don't tell me they wanted to surprise the ppl by sending the issues directly to thr room)..and well..they had enough time to get the issues printed in huge amounts to get them distributed in all the halls.

    As for the point 3, U again misunderstood me Mr. Chintan."Some might argue that this was the final edition of theirs in this session, but then, shudn't this have calld for a better quality of paper that was used to publish it...considering it was to be a "special" issue??" I didn't make any assumptions. I was just giving my opinion. Considering u are one of the elites in the team, u should have guessed that man.
    And the issue was not just about the so-called-nehru bashing, it was also about the Hospital..so what? I think SA team have enough grey cells in them to give some important articles too..otherwise.wudn't it have been so very..."obvious" to the others too? :)

    Point 4 of yours was unnecessary on your part. I think SA works with a budget(don't they?). So sending the issues to each and every room would them ead to a compromise in the quality of paper, wouldn't it?. And as u yourself said, "Did it make a difference in the readability of the news?" :)

    Point 5 : DUDE!!!..U have to defend yourself in a personal blog??? U think a BLOG is going to tarnish the image of the newspaper?? Well..if the SA team themselves think a blog can do this, then I guess u ppl know that there must be something true about what is being said..ryte?

    Stop trying to defend the truth man. If u can read between the lines, and i guess being one of the elites u should have, even u know whatever was written in this blog is true.

    Thats all there is to it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. ohh and Mr. Chintan. I would take the liberty to say something about u. Just as u had to say about Vivek in your comment.

    U really should try to analyze each person before making a comment on him and well..losing respect for that person. Do u really think he is just an editor of a newspaper who is as hypocrite? I guess u do not hve the ability to see the bigger picture.

    Do u really think that Manzar was done just because SF did not have enough Literary fests? For your info, this fest, called Manzar, was put up in 2 months time period by a workforce half that of SF or Kshitij just to prove that Organizing a fest is not that big a deal. In terms of participation, even u know why ppl didn't turn up and I guess SA has gone on to say tht the event was slothful!!

    Man..i guess u really have some problem in your analyzing department up there! 'Coz u hadn't, U wudn't have gone on to lose respectof that magnanious a person just because of an issue which not even the SA team has been able to defend till now.

    There is something called a moral responsibility which a newspaper has. Ever heard of it? U just can't go on printing anything and everything whatever u could find. As has been written in the SA,STORIES of emotionally charged people shaking their heads (as also other body parts).....'...Did anyone come to see what was going on in the hall??..did anyone report this news to you?? And man!!..what a selection of words....U still defending yourself??

    ReplyDelete
  27. Kool....SA elite editors are on Personal attacks after reading the blog. No problem...aisa hota hai...jab kuch nahi soojhta defend karne ke liye to personal attacks hi hote hain...
    and as far as i feel...THis blog is nothing to do with Manzar .....but again...ek doosre ko neecha dikhane ke liye they can use anything as a tool....lots of examples are there in the articles of SA.....
    They are boasting about publishing two lines about the Platininm GC, I don't know this will ever happen again in the Campus. But I just remeber SA issue just 1 year bak when there was a Victory and The whole newspaper was like reporting the victory. If you don't have the issues ,our elite editors, do tell me.... I have one...
    And I am sure...they will defend again !!!![:)]

    ReplyDelete
  28. If the quality of the newspaper was reduced by 25%, the issue was distributed to 500% more people!

    That is certainly compensating enough. And even after this, SA maintain to distribute it free of cost to all students, faculty and restaurants not even getting any funds from the institute. That has to be appreciated.

    On top of this, even after the 25% reduction in paper quality, it still holds as a better than times of india paper quality.

    This was not a "special issue"

    ReplyDelete
  29. Mr Vivek, I hold utmost respect for Chintan and Sunny,
    and let me bring it to your notice, they both really appreciated your work and dedication to bring up an innovative fest like Manzar.
    It is only for them that we had a pre-event cover up article on Manzar, which looked to be promising, atleast to those two, who "respected" you!
    But then things changed.

    ReplyDelete
  30. very funny indeed...SA commits mistake n then defends it... gosh u guys r too good...u wont ever accept ur mistakes.... duh v all know (it includes SA ppl as well)..how biased you are,n dnt pretend as if v wont come 2 know..who wrote d article n d last moment changes made..I think Mr. Chintan you should b knowing wht earlier article was about which never saw the light of the day.. n you guys have made enough personal comments on Anant singh.. n you say you have lost respect for Vivek Kumar...Mr. Thakkar I had great respect for you...till i came 2 know even u support this political newspaper.... meant for personal benefits... you guys r shameless...I pity u...

    ReplyDelete
  31. And intel inside....
    We report events that occur. Good or bad, they are still events.

    Anyway you have full rights to blog what you feel about our issue.

    Its like asking CNNIBN as to why they are covering "Ash-Abhi wedding" or "Gere-Shilpa kiss"!

    ReplyDelete
  32. Mr Aditya,
    I really appreciate your concept of marketing respect.
    You must respect the persons you have mentioned, willingly or unwillingly. They're your sr editors.
    What i could figure out from your words is that i 've lost respect in the eyes of two very respectable persons for you, just because of this blog. Right?

    Next, Manzar received the favour of pre-event coverage just because of this unwarranted respect. Right?

    1.Boss, i'm not here to earn people's respect. Good people should have the strength to face criticism and take it on a positive note. And i know that these two are good people.
    2.Thanks for your favour of publicising the event. And dont worry as you think that the favour was undue. Believe me, it didnt yield much.

    A request-
    I 'd be thankful to you all if you could stick to the issue raised in the blog and not create sub-threads of discussion, especially personal comments and discussions.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Hats off to you Vivek...aapke is blog se kitne saare logon ne repect paaye aur khooyee..... TOO Much !!![:D]....Bu the way... i appreciate people defending SA, but why are they getting personal...this is a dark act should never be supported.....
    The blog is just commenting upon the level of journalism...not on an individual...but again there are some people who are still posting personal and I don't know how Manzar is related to this blog...some one please explain it to me !!!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Aditya,
    I must say that in your last comment i found something that was the only sensible reply from your team and has the key to the issue.

    You know that there's a section that enjoys acts like "Gere-Shilpa kiss" being given the hype it gets in media. But, we all accept that things like this should not be reported and at least, should be restricted to the corner. One should face the music while doing the same in an intellectual society like IIT. I just wish to see these guidelines being followed.
    An individual has every right to blog what he feels but a paper doesnt have rights to report anything the way it feels. You must realize that.

    We 're not in a war. We 're in a discussion and a discussion must yield something.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Do visit www.pranksteresh.blogspot.com. all of u ll sure love it.

    ReplyDelete
  36. This is great info to know.

    ReplyDelete